Supplemental Results
Yeang CH*, Mak HC*, McCuine S, Workman C, Jaakola T, Ideker TI
Genome Biology (2005) 6:R62   [fulltext] [PDF]


 Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory /
    Laboratory for Integrative Network Biology
MIT / UC San Diego
 ·  Home
Methods
 ·  Experimental Protocols
 ·  Internal Validation of Models
 ·  Knockout Data Reproducibility
·  Regulated Gene Selection
 ·  Building Physical Network Models
·  Protein-DNA Data
·  Protein-Protein Data
·  Knockout Data
 ·  Model Inference
 ·  Software Download
 ·  Evaluating for New Experiments
Data
 ·  Inferred Network Models
 ·  Download Network Model Data
 ·  References

Selecting Genes Putatively Regulated By Msn4 Or Hap4

Despite a significant improvement when restricting the expression profiles to putative targets, the reproducibility of individual gene expression levels between the two replicate data sets in model #1 is still relatively low. Among the 65 downstream genes in model #1, only 27 genes experienced significant changes in the same directions in both SWI4 deletion data sets. Thus, rather than validating individual interactions between Msn4/Hap4 and these downstream genes, we instead validated the overall pathways of Swi4-Sok2-(Msn4, Hap4). To reduce both false positives and false negatives from the downstream hubs (Msn4, Hap4) to their affected genes, we selected the genes which are known to be directly regulated by one of these factors (obtained from the Proteome BioKnowledge Library and ChIP-chip data (Lee et al. 2002); Table S4 includes the selected genes for the validation of Msn4 and Hap4 pathways.

Table S4: Gene sets for external validation.

Msn4 subset
ALD3
ARA1
CTT1
YMR173W
DOT5
GLK1
GLO1
GRE3
GSY1
HOR2
HSP12
HSP26
HSP104
HXK1
LAP4
PGM2
RAS2
SOD2
SOL4
SPS100
SSA4
TKL2
TPS1
TTR1
YDL124W
YKR011C
YMR315W
YNL200C


Hap4 subset
ATP3
ATP7
ATP16
COX4
COX7
COX12
COX13
QCR7
TUF1
QCR10
YLR294C